Semantic Classification of Artificial Intelligence Incidents Based on Vector Embeddings and the TAIM Framework

Authors

  • Anton Kulyk

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, AI incidents, semantic classification, vector embeddings, TAIM framework, AI risk management, cosine similarity

Abstract

The article examines the semantic classification of artificial intelligence incidents based on vector embeddings and the TAIM framework. The aim of the study is to develop and validate a methodology that links textual descriptions of AI incidents with the Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage domains. The relevance of the work is determined by the growing number of incidents, the fragmentation of data sources, and the limitations of manual expert annotation. The scientific novelty lies in the construction of an end-to-end pipeline that transforms unstructured reports into quantitative metrics of semantic similarity with TAIM control areas, while preserving confidentiality through local use of Ollama. It is shown that vector embeddings increase the completeness of identifying conceptually related risks, including cases of terminological divergence. The largest share of incidents falls within the Manage domain, which indicates the importance of infrastructural, organizational, and procedural response measures. The obtained results confirm the potential of semantic mapping for AI audit, monitoring, and risk management. The article will be useful for specialists in AI Governance, information security, compliance, AI auditing, and researchers of digital technology risks.

Author Biography

  • Anton Kulyk

    CEO and Founder, Cyber Trust Innovations LLC, USA

References

[1] A. B. Rashid and A. K. Kausik, “AI Revolutionizing Industries Worldwide: a Comprehensive Overview of Its Diverse Applications,” Hybrid Advances, vol. 7, p. 100277, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277

[2] A. Newcomb and O. Ochoa, “Formal methods for safety-critical machine learning: a systematic literature review,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1749956

[3] K. Wei and L. Heim, “Designing Incident Reporting Systems for Harms from General-Purpose AI,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 44, pp. 38016–38029, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i44.41139

[4] K. J. D. Chan, G. Papyshev, and M. Yarime, “Balancing the Tradeoff between Regulation and Innovation for Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Top-down Command and Control and Bottom-up Self-Regulatory Approaches,” Technology in Society, vol. 79, p. 102747, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102747

[5] M. Chatzipanagiotis, “Incident reporting and investigation under the AI act: some insights from aviation,” International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 34, p. eaaf019, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf019

[6] W. Raghupathi, J. Ren, and T. Kulkarni, “Examining the Nature and Dimensions of Artificial Intelligence Incidents: A Machine Learning Text Analytics Approach,” AppliedMath, vol. 6, p. 11, 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath6010011

[7] D. Russo, G. M. Orlando, L. Gatta, and V. Moscato, “Automating AI Failure Tracking: Semantic Association of Reports in AI Incident Database,” ArXiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.23669

[8] C. L. Miller, “Risk Management Framework for Procuring AI Solutions,” American Journal of Management, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026. https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v26i1.8098

Downloads

Published

2026-06-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Anton Kulyk. (2026). Semantic Classification of Artificial Intelligence Incidents Based on Vector Embeddings and the TAIM Framework. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 57(1), 401-409. https://ijcjournal.org/InternationalJournalOfComputer/article/view/2546