Layered Architecture in Enterprise BPM Systems as a Foundation for Long-Term Extensibility

Authors

  • Mykhailo Krasovskyi

Keywords:

business process management systems, enterprise architecture, layered architecture, extensibility, system integration, architectural coupling, enterprise information systems.

Abstract

This article addresses the challenge of ensuring the long-term extensibility of enterprise business process management (BPM) systems under conditions of increasing architectural complexity and a growing number of integrations with external systems. Particular attention is paid to the limitations of traditional architectural approaches based on tightly coupled components, where even minor modifications affect multiple system layers and reduce maintainability. The study combines an analytical review of recent research on enterprise architecture, business process management, event-driven execution, and data-driven BPM with a case analysis of the OpenText MBPM platform. The findings demonstrate that a system’s capacity for sustainable evolution is determined primarily by its architectural structure and the distribution of changes across layers rather than by the number of implemented functions or modular extensions. Based on the analysis, the study proposes the Layered Extensibility Architecture for BPM Systems (LEA-BPM), which distinguishes a stable architectural core comprising data storage, process execution, and deployment from design and interaction layers where modifications are localized. The proposed model extends existing approaches to BPM architecture by conceptualizing extensibility as a structural property achieved through change isolation across architectural layers. The practical value of the model lies in supporting the design and evolution of enterprise BPM systems operating in environments characterized by continuous process changes and intensive system integration, enabling the introduction of new functionality and external connections without modifying core system components. The article is intended for researchers and practitioners in enterprise architecture, enterprise information systems development, business process management, and digital transformation.

References

[1] E. Atencio, M. Mancini, and G. Bustos, “Ontology-based integration of enterprise architecture and project management: A systems thinking approach for project-based organizations in the architecture, engineering, and construction sector,” Systems, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 477, 2025, doi: 10.3390/systems13060477.

[2] I. Oumoussa and R. Saidi, “The ontology-based mapping of microservice identification approaches: A systematic study of migration strategies from monolithic to microservice architectures,” Computers, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 133, 2025, doi: 10.3390/computers14040133.

[3] E. Atencio, G. Bustos, and M. Mancini, “Enterprise architecture approach for project management and project-based organizations: A review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 9801, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14169801.

[4] M. Rosemann, W. M. P. van der Aalst, A. Van Looy, et al., “Business process management in the age of AI: Three essential drifts,” Information Systems and e-Business Management, vol. 22, pp. 415–429, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10257-024-00689-9.

[5] G. Fuentes-Quijada, F. Ruiz-González, and A. Caro, “Enterprise architecture and IT governance to support the BizDevOps approach: A systematic mapping study,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 27, pp. 865–888, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10796-024-10473-2.

[6] M. Saeedi Nikoo, S. Kochanthara, Ö. Babur, et al., “An empirical study of business process models and model clones on GitHub,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 30, p. 48, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10664-024-10584-z.

[7] A. Awad, F. Awaysheh, and H. López, “BEST: A unified business process enactment via streams and tables for service computing,” Process Science, vol. 2, p. 23, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44311-025-00030-8.

[8] G. Pisoni and M. Moloney, “Responsible AI-based business process management and improvement,” Discover Information Systems and Operations, vol. 3, p. 23, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44206-024-00105-2.

[9] T. Skouti, R. Seiger, F. J. Furrer, et al., “RBPMN: The value of roles for business process modeling,” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 23, pp. 1375–1406, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10270-024-01202-z.

[10] D. Chapela-Campa and M. Dumas, “From process mining to augmented process execution,” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 22, pp. 1977–1986, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10270-023-01132-2.

[11] F. De Luzi, F. Leotta, A. Marrella, et al., “On the interplay between business process management and Internet-of-Things,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 67, pp. 265–288, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12599-024-00859-6.

[12] B. Uyanık and A. Sayar, “Developing web-based process management with automatic code generation,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 11737, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app132111737.

[13] T. Kampik, C. Warmuth, A. Rebmann, et al., “Large process models: A vision for business process management in the age of generative AI,” Künstliche Intelligenz, vol. 39, pp. 81–95, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s13218-024-00863-8.

[14] Z. Shi, J. Dong, and Y. Gan, “Democratizing digital transformation: A multisector study of low-code adoption patterns, limitations, and emerging paradigms,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 6481, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15126481.

[15] A. Rani, D. Mishra, and A. Omerovic, “Enterprise modelling for decision-making in the software ecosystem,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, p. 11134, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90916-1.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Krasovskyi , M. . (2026). Layered Architecture in Enterprise BPM Systems as a Foundation for Long-Term Extensibility. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 57(1), 673-681. https://ijcjournal.org/InternationalJournalOfComputer/article/view/2574