Adaption of Moodle as E-Learning in Saudi Arabian University: Empirical Examination and its Outcomes Using TAM
Modern universities increasingly rely on e-Learning management systems to ensure their students have a richer and more-efficient learning experience. The choice and adaption of such systems need careful evaluation to achieve their intended goals. This paper describes the experience of using Moodle as an e-Learning System in Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia. The paper describes the benefits of the system and highlights the problems that were encountered while adapting it. It also explains an analysis study which uses an acceptance model to assure the adaptability of the system in the university by the stakeholders. The study confirms the importance of the project for the university and its impact on the working ethics for the employees as well as the students.
. Kolari, S., C. Savander-Ranne, and E.-L. Viskari, Do our engineering students spend enough time studying? European Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 31(5): p. 499-508.
. Amelung, M., M. Piotrowski, and D. Rösner, EduComponents: Experiences in e-assessment in computer science education. Vol. 38. 2006: ACM.
. Umek, L., et al., Analysis of Selected Aspects of Students' Performance and Satisfaction in a Moodle-Based E-Learning System Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2015. 11(6).
. Jackson, D. and M. Usher. Grading student programs using ASSYST. in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 1997. ACM.
. Malmi, L., A. Korhonen, and R. Saikkonen, Experiences in automatic assessment on mass courses and issues for designing virtual courses. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2002. 34(3): p. 55-59.
. Douce, C., D. Livingstone, and J. Orwell, Automatic test-based assessment of programming: A review. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 2005. 5(3): p. 4.
. Karavirta, V., A. Korhonen, and L. Malmi, On the use of resubmissions in automatic assessment systems. Computer science education, 2006. 16(3): p. 229-240.
. Bennedsen, J., M.E. Caspersen, and M. Kölling, Reflections on the teaching of programming: Methods and implementations. Vol. 4821. 2008: Springer.
. Rosales, F., et al., Detection of plagiarism in programming assignments. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2008. 51(2): p. 174-183.
. Butakov, S. and V. Scherbinin, The toolbox for local and global plagiarism detection. Computers & Education, 2009. 52(4): p. 781-788.
. Djordjevic, J., B. Nikolic, and A. Milenkovic, Flexible web-based educational system for teaching computer architecture and organization. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2005. 48(2): p. 264-273.
. Garcia, A., et al., Automatic management of laboratory work in mass computer engineering courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2005. 48(1): p. 89-98.
. Garcia, M.I., et al., p88110: A graphical simulator for computer architecture and organization courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2009. 52(2): p. 248-256.
. Robinson, B., Using Distance Education and ICT to Improve Access, Equity and the Quality in Rural Teachers' Professional Development in Western China. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2008. 9(1): p. 1-17.
. Trenas, M.A., et al., Use of a new moodle module for improving the teaching of a basic course on computer architecture. IEEE transactions on Education, 2011. 54(2): p. 222-228.
. Jonassen, D.H. Constructivist learning environments on the web: engaging students in meaningful learning. in THE EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, SINGAPORE. RETRIEVED SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 FROM HTTP://WWW. MOE. EDU. SG/ITEDUCATION/EDTECH/PAPERS/D1. PDF. 1999. Citeseer.
. Jonassen, D., T. Mayes, and R. McAleese, 11 A Manifesto for a Constructivist Approach to Uses of Technology in Higher Education. Designing environments for constructive learning, 1993. 105: p. 231.
. Khalifa, M. and R. Lam, Web-based learning: effects on learning process and outcome. IEEE Transactions on education, 2002. 45(4): p. 350-356.
. Tan, W., et al., Design on collaborative virtual learning community and learning process visualization. Advances in Web Based Learning-ICWL 2008, 2008: p. 424-433.
. Martín-Blas, T. and A. Serrano-Fernández, The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 2009. 52(1): p. 35-44.
. Büchner, A., Moodle 3 Administration. 2016: Packt Publishing Ltd.
. Karanian, B.A. and L.G. Chedid, Guest editorial 21st century trends that influence constructing creative classroom environments. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2004. 47(2): p. 157-159.
. Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 1989: p. 319-340.
. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. 1975.
. Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis, A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision sciences, 1996. 27(3): p. 451-481.
. Hair, J.F., et al., Multivariate data analysis. Vol. 5. 1998: Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
. De Vaus, D., Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. 2002: Sage.
. Wold, S., K. Esbensen, and P. Geladi, Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, 1987. 2(1-3): p. 37-52.
. Kaiser, H.F., The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958. 23(3): p. 187-200.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to reject the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.